diversity rankings::Boston::black (from betterlegalprofession.org)
| partners | associates | ||||||||||
| rank | firm | percent | M | F | rank | firm | percent | M | F | ||
| 1 | Proskauer Rose | 3.8 | 1 | 0 | A | 1 | Nixon Peabody | 7.4 | 2 | 2 | A |
| 2 | Wilmerhale | 2.6 | 3 | 0 | 2 | Choate, Hall & Stewart | 7.1 | 3 | 1 | ||
| 3 | Hinckley, Allen & Snyder | 2.2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | Edwards Angell | 5.0 | 2 | 2 | ||
| 4 | Holland & Knight | 1.5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | Dla Piper Us | 4.3 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 5 | Ropes & Gray | 1.4 | 1 | 1 | B | 5 | Foley & Lardner | 4.3 | 1 | 0 | |
| 6 | Choate, Hall & Stewart | 1.2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | Seyfarth Shaw | 4.3 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 7 | Bingham Mccutchen | 0.9 | 1 | 0 | 7 | Fish & Richardson | 4.2 | 0 | 1 | B | |
| 8 | Mintz, Levin | 0.8 | 1 | 0 | 8 | Holland & Knight | 4.0 | 0 | 2 | ||
| 9 | Goodwin Procter | 0.5 | 1 | 0 | C | 9 | Ropes & Gray | 2.1 | 2 | 5 | C |
| 10 | Dla Piper Us | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | F | 10 | Bingham Mccutchen | 1.7 | 1 | 1 | |
| 11 | Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | Nutter, Mcclennen & Fish | 1.7 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 12 | Mcdermott Will & Emery | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | Goodwin Procter | 1.7 | 3 | 1 | ||
| 13 | Foley & Lardner | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | Wilmerhale | 1.6 | 2 | 1 | D | |
| 14 | Fish & Richardson | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | Proskauer Rose | 1.2 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 15 | Seyfarth Shaw | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | Mintz, Levin | 0.8 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 16 | K&L Gates | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | F | |
| 17 | Nutter, Mcclennen & Fish | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | Mcdermott Will & Emery | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 18 | Nixon Peabody | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | K&L Gates | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 19 | Edwards Angell | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | Hinckley, Allen & Snyder | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||
An asterisk indicates that the firm did not provide this information. We treated missing data as if it were zero.
See How We Did This for more information on our methodology.
Bold denotes the most prestigious law firms in Boston, according to vault's 2011 regional rankings