diversity rankings::Boston::hispanic (from betterlegalprofession.org)
| partners | associates | ||||||||||
| rank | firm | percent | M | F | rank | firm | percent | M | F | ||
| 1 | Fish & Richardson | 9.4 | 3 | 0 | A | 1 | Foley & Lardner | 8.7 | 0 | 2 | A |
| 2 | Edwards Angell | 3.3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | Seyfarth Shaw | 8.7 | 2 | 0 | ||
| 3 | K&L Gates | 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | Nixon Peabody | 5.6 | 2 | 1 | ||
| 4 | Ropes & Gray | 1.4 | 0 | 2 | 4 | Mcdermott Will & Emery | 5.3 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 5 | Choate, Hall & Stewart | 1.2 | 1 | 0 | B | 5 | K&L Gates | 4.3 | 2 | 0 | B |
| 6 | Bingham Mccutchen | 0.9 | 1 | 0 | 6 | Ropes & Gray | 2.8 | 3 | 6 | ||
| 7 | Wilmerhale | 0.9 | 1 | 0 | 7 | Proskauer Rose | 2.5 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | Goodwin Procter | 0.5 | 1 | 0 | 8 | Mintz, Levin | 2.3 | 1 | 2 | ||
| 9 | Dla Piper Us | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | F | 9 | Goodwin Procter | 2.1 | 2 | 3 | C |
| 10 | Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | Choate, Hall & Stewart | 1.8 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 11 | Mcdermott Will & Emery | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | Bingham Mccutchen | 1.7 | 2 | 0 | ||
| 12 | Foley & Lardner | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | Wilmerhale | 1.1 | 2 | 0 | ||
| 13 | Seyfarth Shaw | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | F | |
| 14 | Proskauer Rose | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | Dla Piper Us | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 15 | Holland & Knight | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | Fish & Richardson | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 16 | Hinckley, Allen & Snyder | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | Holland & Knight | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 17 | Nutter, Mcclennen & Fish | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | Hinckley, Allen & Snyder | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 18 | Nixon Peabody | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | Nutter, Mcclennen & Fish | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 19 | Mintz, Levin | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | Edwards Angell | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||
An asterisk indicates that the firm did not provide this information. We treated missing data as if it were zero.
See How We Did This for more information on our methodology.
Bold denotes the most prestigious law firms in Boston, according to vault's 2011 regional rankings