diversity rankings::Boston::out lgbt (from betterlegalprofession.org)
| partners | associates | ||||||||||
| rank | firm | percent | M | F | rank | firm | percent | M | F | ||
| 1 | K&L Gates | 8.0 | 4 | 0 | A | 1 | Mcdermott Will & Emery | 15.8 | 3 | 0 | A |
| 2 | Edwards Angell | 5.4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | Nixon Peabody | 9.3 | 1 | 4 | ||
| 3 | Mintz, Levin | 5.3 | 1 | 6 | 3 | Foley & Lardner | 8.7 | 2 | 0 | ||
| 4 | Seyfarth Shaw | 5.0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | Ropes & Gray | 8.3 | 15 | 12 | ||
| 5 | Holland & Knight | 4.6 | 2 | 1 | B | 5 | Mintz, Levin | 5.4 | 3 | 4 | B |
| 6 | Proskauer Rose | 3.8 | 1 | 0 | 6 | Dla Piper Us | 4.3 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 7 | Hinckley, Allen & Snyder | 3.2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks | 4.3 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 8 | Foley & Lardner | 3.0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | Seyfarth Shaw | 4.3 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 9 | Nixon Peabody | 2.6 | 1 | 1 | C | 9 | Choate, Hall & Stewart | 3.6 | 1 | 1 | C |
| 10 | Ropes & Gray | 2.1 | 2 | 1 | 10 | Nutter, Mcclennen & Fish | 3.4 | 2 | 0 | ||
| 11 | Nutter, Mcclennen & Fish | 1.4 | 0 | 1 | 11 | Wilmerhale | 3.2 | 1 | 5 | ||
| 12 | Choate, Hall & Stewart | 1.2 | 1 | 0 | 12 | Bingham Mccutchen | 2.6 | 1 | 2 | ||
| 13 | Goodwin Procter | 1.1 | 2 | 0 | D | 13 | Edwards Angell | 2.5 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 14 | Dla Piper Us | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | F | 14 | Goodwin Procter | 1.7 | 2 | 2 | |
| 15 | Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | Proskauer Rose | 1.2 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 16 | Mcdermott Will & Emery | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | Fish & Richardson | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | F | |
| 17 | Fish & Richardson | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | K&L Gates | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 18 | Bingham Mccutchen | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | Holland & Knight | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 19 | Wilmerhale | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | Hinckley, Allen & Snyder | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||
An asterisk indicates that the firm did not provide this information. We treated missing data as if it were zero.
See How We Did This for more information on our methodology.
Bold denotes the most prestigious law firms in Boston, according to vault's 2011 regional rankings