diversity rankings::Washington, DC::asian (from betterlegalprofession.org)
| partners |
|
associates |
|
| rank |
firm |
percent |
M |
F |
|
rank |
firm |
percent |
M |
F |
|
| 1 | Mckenna Long & Aldridge | 6.6 | 4 | 0 | A | 1 | Goodwin Procter | 23.6 | 8 | 5 | A |
| 2 | Pillsbury Winthrop | 6.0 | 4 | 1 | 2 | Finnegan, Henderson | 23.6 | 17 | 13 |
| 3 | Cleary Gottlieb | 5.3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | Foley & Lardner | 18.9 | 10 | 0 |
| 4 | Foley & Lardner | 5.2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | White & Case | 15.2 | 7 | 9 |
| 5 | Akin Gump | 5.1 | 4 | 1 | 5 | O'Melveny & Myers | 15.1 | 5 | 6 |
| 6 | Crowell & Moring | 4.9 | 5 | 1 | 6 | Arnold & Porter | 12.4 | 17 | 14 |
| 7 | Kirkland & Ellis | 4.7 | 4 | 0 | 7 | K&L Gates | 12.3 | 3 | 5 |
| 8 | Skadden, Arps | 4.5 | 3 | 0 | 8 | Morgan, Lewis & Bockius | 11.6 | 7 | 7 |
| 9 | Fried, Frank | 3.8 | 1 | 0 | B | 9 | Mcdermott Will & Emery | 11.5 | 6 | 3 | B |
| 10 | Arnold & Porter | 3.7 | 3 | 2 | 10 | Dickstein Shapiro | 10.9 | 4 | 6 |
| 11 | Williams & Connolly | 3.6 | 2 | 2 | 11 | Wilmerhale | 10.2 | 11 | 11 |
| 12 | Bingham Mccutchen | 3.4 | 2 | 1 | 12 | Fried, Frank | 10.2 | 2 | 4 |
| 13 | Hunton & Williams | 3.4 | 1 | 2 | 13 | Crowell & Moring | 10.1 | 5 | 4 |
| 14 | Finnegan, Henderson | 3.4 | 3 | 0 | 14 | Dow Lohnes | 9.8 | 2 | 2 |
| 15 | Mayer Brown | 3.1 | 2 | 0 | 15 | Mckenna Long & Aldridge | 9.8 | 4 | 0 |
| 16 | Mcdermott Will & Emery | 3.0 | 3 | 0 | 16 | Arent Fox | 9.3 | 4 | 4 |
| 17 | Sutherland Asbill | 3.0 | 1 | 1 | C | 17 | Jones Day | 9.2 | 4 | 6 | C |
| 18 | Wiley Rein | 3.0 | 3 | 1 | 18 | Covington & Burling | 9.2 | 10 | 14 |
| 19 | Morgan, Lewis & Bockius | 3.0 | 3 | 0 | 19 | Wiley Rein | 8.8 | 4 | 4 |
| 20 | Dickstein Shapiro | 2.9 | 2 | 1 | 20 | Winston & Strawn | 8.5 | 3 | 3 |
| 21 | Wilmerhale | 2.8 | 1 | 2 | 21 | Latham & Watkins | 8.0 | 4 | 9 |
| 22 | Steptoe & Johnson | 2.8 | 2 | 1 | 22 | King & Spalding | 7.8 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | White & Case | 2.8 | 0 | 1 | 23 | Cleary Gottlieb | 7.7 | 1 | 5 |
| 24 | O'Melveny & Myers | 2.6 | 1 | 0 | 24 | Pillsbury Winthrop | 7.7 | 2 | 3 |
| 25 | Goodwin Procter | 2.4 | 1 | 0 | D | 25 | Skadden, Arps | 7.6 | 4 | 8 | D |
| 26 | Dla Piper Us | 2.3 | 0 | 2 | 26 | Kirkland & Ellis | 7.4 | 3 | 5 |
| 27 | Latham & Watkins | 2.3 | 2 | 0 | 27 | Dla Piper Us | 6.8 | 2 | 1 |
| 28 | Winston & Strawn | 1.9 | 1 | 0 | 28 | Sidley Austin | 6.7 | 5 | 3 |
| 29 | Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher | 1.9 | 0 | 1 | 29 | Hogan & Hartson | 6.7 | 4 | 10 |
| 30 | Hogan & Hartson | 1.7 | 3 | 1 | 30 | Bingham Mccutchen | 6.2 | 2 | 2 |
| 31 | Patton Boggs | 1.4 | 1 | 1 | 31 | Mayer Brown | 5.9 | 3 | 0 |
| 32 | Jones Day | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 32 | Hunton & Williams | 5.7 | 4 | 1 |
| 33 | Holland & Knight | 0.9 | 1 | 0 | F | 33 | Williams & Connolly | 5.3 | 4 | 3 | F |
| 34 | Arent Fox | 0.8 | 0 | 1 | 34 | Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher | 4.9 | 5 | 0 |
| 35 | Covington & Burling | 0.7 | 1 | 0 | 35 | Steptoe & Johnson | 4.7 | 2 | 3 |
| 36 | Baker Botts | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | Sutherland Asbill | 4.4 | 3 | 0 |
| 37 | Paul, Hastings | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 37 | Akin Gump | 4.1 | 2 | 3 |
| 38 | Dow Lohnes | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 38 | Patton Boggs | 2.5 | 1 | 1 |
| 39 | King & Spalding | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 39 | Holland & Knight | 2.2 | 0 | 1 |
| 40 | K&L Gates | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | Baker Botts | 1.9 | 1 | 0 |
| 41 | Sidley Austin | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 41 | Paul, Hastings | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
The chart includes all firms with 100 attorneys in their Washington, DC office.
An asterisk indicates that the firm did not provide this information. We treated missing data as if it were zero.
See How We Did This for more information on our methodology.
Bold denotes the most prestigious law firms in Washington, DC, according to vault's 2011 regional rankings