diversity rankings::Washington, DC::hispanic (from betterlegalprofession.org)
| partners |
|
associates |
|
| rank |
firm |
percent |
M |
F |
|
rank |
firm |
percent |
M |
F |
|
| 1 | Dla Piper Us | 4.7 | 3 | 1 | A | 1 | Foley & Lardner | 7.3 | 0 | 3 | A |
| 2 | Fried, Frank | 3.2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | Holland & Knight | 7.0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3 | White & Case | 3.1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | Jones Day | 6.5 | 3 | 4 |
| 4 | Patton Boggs | 2.9 | 2 | 2 | 4 | Hunton & Williams | 6.4 | 3 | 3 |
| 5 | Arnold & Porter | 2.9 | 3 | 1 | 5 | Covington & Burling | 6.0 | 6 | 9 |
| 6 | Williams & Connolly | 2.8 | 2 | 1 | 6 | Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher | 5.9 | 3 | 3 |
| 7 | Steptoe & Johnson | 2.8 | 3 | 0 | 7 | White & Case | 5.8 | 2 | 4 |
| 8 | Wiley Rein | 2.3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | Dow Lohnes | 5.7 | 2 | 0 |
| 9 | Bingham Mccutchen | 2.2 | 2 | 0 | 9 | Winston & Strawn | 5.7 | 2 | 2 |
| 10 | Akin Gump | 2.0 | 2 | 0 | B | 10 | Crowell & Moring | 5.6 | 1 | 5 | B |
| 11 | K&L Gates | 1.9 | 1 | 1 | 11 | Venable Llp - Baltimore | 5.4 | 2 | 3 |
| 12 | Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher | 1.8 | 1 | 0 | 12 | Morgan, Lewis & Bockius | 5.4 | 1 | 6 |
| 13 | Winston & Strawn | 1.8 | 1 | 0 | 13 | Arnold & Porter | 5.1 | 8 | 4 |
| 14 | King & Spalding | 1.8 | 0 | 1 | 14 | Baker Botts | 4.9 | 2 | 1 |
| 15 | Mckenna Long & Aldridge | 1.7 | 1 | 0 | 15 | Howrey | 4.7 | 4 | 2 |
| 16 | Foley & Lardner | 1.6 | 1 | 0 | 16 | Patton Boggs | 4.7 | 1 | 3 |
| 17 | Venable Llp - Baltimore | 1.6 | 2 | 0 | 17 | Wiley Rein | 4.3 | 2 | 2 |
| 18 | Mayer Brown | 1.4 | 1 | 0 | 18 | Bingham Mccutchen | 4.2 | 2 | 1 |
| 19 | Covington & Burling | 1.4 | 1 | 1 | 19 | Arent Fox | 4.1 | 4 | 0 | C |
| 20 | Skadden, Arps | 1.3 | 1 | 0 | C | 20 | Paul, Hastings | 3.9 | 1 | 2 |
| 21 | Hogan & Hartson | 1.3 | 0 | 3 | 21 | Hogan & Hartson | 3.9 | 2 | 7 |
| 22 | Pillsbury Winthrop | 1.1 | 1 | 0 | 22 | Steptoe & Johnson | 3.8 | 1 | 3 |
| 23 | Finnegan, Henderson | 1.1 | 0 | 1 | 23 | Latham & Watkins | 3.8 | 3 | 3 |
| 24 | Holland & Knight | 0.9 | 1 | 0 | 24 | Kelley Drye & Warren | 3.6 | 2 | 0 |
| 25 | Howrey | 0.9 | 1 | 0 | 25 | Wilmerhale | 3.6 | 4 | 4 |
| 26 | Arent Fox | 0.8 | 0 | 1 | 26 | Dewey & Leboeuf | 3.5 | 1 | 1 |
| 27 | Mcdermott Will & Emery | 0.8 | 1 | 0 | 27 | Fried, Frank | 3.2 | 2 | 0 |
| 28 | Crowell & Moring | 0.8 | 1 | 0 | D | 28 | Williams & Connolly | 3.1 | 1 | 3 | D |
| 29 | Kelley Drye & Warren | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | F | 29 | Sutherland Asbill | 3.0 | 1 | 1 |
| 30 | Willkie Farr & Gallagher | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | Willkie Farr & Gallagher | 2.9 | 2 | 0 |
| 31 | Cleary Gottlieb | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 31 | Pillsbury Winthrop | 2.7 | 1 | 1 |
| 32 | Sughrue Mion, P | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 32 | Kirkland & Ellis | 2.7 | 3 | 0 |
| 33 | Dow Lohnes | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 33 | K&L Gates | 2.7 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | Baker Botts | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 34 | Dla Piper Us | 2.6 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | Dewey & Leboeuf | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 35 | Mcdermott Will & Emery | 2.6 | 1 | 1 |
| 36 | Paul, Hastings | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | O'Melveny & Myers | 2.3 | 1 | 1 |
| 37 | O'Melveny & Myers | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 37 | Mckenna Long & Aldridge | 2.0 | 1 | 0 | F |
| 38 | Sutherland Asbill | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 38 | Sughrue Mion, P | 1.9 | 1 | 0 |
| 39 | Hunton & Williams | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 39 | Mayer Brown | 1.6 | 1 | 0 |
| 40 | Kirkland & Ellis | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | Finnegan, Henderson | 1.5 | 1 | 1 |
| 41 | Jones Day | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 41 | Skadden, Arps | 1.4 | 2 | 0 |
| 42 | Dickstein Shapiro | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 42 | King & Spalding | 1.3 | 0 | 1 |
| 43 | Sidley Austin | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 43 | Akin Gump | 0.9 | 0 | 1 |
| 44 | Latham & Watkins | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 44 | Sidley Austin | 0.8 | 1 | 0 |
| 45 | Morgan, Lewis & Bockius | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 45 | Cleary Gottlieb | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 46 | Wilmerhale | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 46 | Dickstein Shapiro | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
This chart ranks the percentage of hispanic partners and associates at Washington, DC law offices.
An asterisk indicates that the firm did not provide this information. We treated missing data as if it were zero.
The chart includes all firms with 100 attorneys in their Washington, DC office. See
How We Did This for more on our ranking process.
Firms are graded on a curve. We divide the firms into quintiles, and then assign letter grades based on
this division. We combined the grades with those from other diversity rankings to create a
diversity report card of firms' overall minority employment rates. Note that firms with zero representation in any demographic category receive an "F"
regardless of quintile.
Bold denotes the top 15 most prestigious law firms in Washington, DC, according to vault's 2009 regional rankings