diversity rankings::Manhattan::hispanic (from betterlegalprofession.org)
| partners |
|
associates |
|
| rank |
firm |
percent |
M |
F |
|
rank |
firm |
percent |
M |
F |
|
| 1 | Curtis, Mallet-prevost | 10.9 | 5 | 0 | A | 1 | Curtis, Mallet-prevost | 17.3 | 5 | 9 | A |
| 2 | Cleary Gottlieb | 5.4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | Sidley Austin | 7.9 | 9 | 7 |
| 3 | Kelley Drye & Warren | 5.4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | Moses & Singer | 7.9 | 2 | 1 |
| 4 | Katten Muchin Rosenman | 5.2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | Katten Muchin Rosenman | 7.7 | 3 | 3 |
| 5 | Alston & Bird | 5.0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | Cleary Gottlieb | 7.0 | 15 | 13 |
| 6 | Milbank, Tweed | 4.9 | 2 | 2 | 6 | Morrison & Foerster | 7.0 | 2 | 5 |
| 7 | Hughes Hubbard & Reed | 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 7 | Blank Rome | 6.8 | 0 | 3 |
| 8 | Skadden, Arps | 4.3 | 4 | 5 | 8 | Greenberg Traurig | 6.7 | 2 | 4 |
| 9 | Chadbourne & Parke | 4.0 | 3 | 0 | 9 | Mayer Brown | 6.7 | 5 | 3 |
| 10 | Dewey & Leboeuf | 3.9 | 3 | 3 | 10 | Hogan & Hartson | 6.3 | 1 | 3 |
| 11 | Mayer Brown | 3.5 | 2 | 0 | 11 | Chadbourne & Parke | 5.9 | 4 | 2 |
| 12 | Epstein Becker & Green | 3.3 | 1 | 1 | 12 | Shearman & Sterling | 5.8 | 6 | 8 |
| 13 | Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher | 2.9 | 2 | 0 | 13 | Weil, Gotshal & Manges | 5.7 | 11 | 15 |
| 14 | Weil, Gotshal & Manges | 2.5 | 4 | 0 | B | 14 | Kaye Scholer | 5.7 | 6 | 5 | B |
| 15 | Davis Polk & Wardwell | 2.4 | 3 | 0 | 15 | Simpson Thacher | 5.7 | 17 | 11 |
| 16 | Covington & Burling | 2.4 | 1 | 0 | 16 | Herrick, Feinstein | 5.6 | 2 | 2 |
| 17 | Latham & Watkins | 2.3 | 2 | 0 | 17 | Pillsbury Winthrop | 5.6 | 1 | 2 |
| 18 | O'Melveny & Myers | 2.3 | 0 | 1 | 18 | Paul, Hastings | 5.4 | 3 | 5 |
| 19 | Clifford Chance Us | 2.3 | 1 | 0 | 19 | Stroock & Stroock & Lavan | 5.4 | 5 | 3 |
| 20 | Schulte Roth & Zabel | 2.2 | 2 | 0 | 20 | Kelley Drye & Warren | 5.3 | 1 | 4 |
| 21 | Willkie Farr & Gallagher | 2.0 | 1 | 1 | 21 | Morgan, Lewis & Bockius | 5.2 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | Kaye Scholer | 1.9 | 1 | 1 | 22 | Debevoise & Plimpton | 5.2 | 8 | 12 |
| 23 | Patterson | 1.9 | 0 | 1 | 23 | Milbank, Tweed | 5.1 | 8 | 6 |
| 24 | Paul, Weiss | 1.9 | 2 | 0 | 24 | Baker & Mckenzie | 4.7 | 2 | 0 |
| 25 | Linklaters | 1.9 | 1 | 0 | 25 | Davis Polk & Wardwell | 4.6 | 7 | 14 |
| 26 | Jones Day | 1.8 | 2 | 0 | 26 | Clifford Chance Us | 4.6 | 2 | 4 |
| 27 | Sidley Austin | 1.7 | 1 | 1 | C | 27 | Dewey & Leboeuf | 4.5 | 7 | 7 | C |
| 28 | Hogan & Hartson | 1.6 | 0 | 1 | 28 | White & Case | 4.5 | 5 | 7 |
| 29 | Dechert | 1.6 | 1 | 0 | 29 | Goodwin Procter | 4.4 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | Morrison & Foerster | 1.6 | 0 | 1 | 30 | Covington & Burling | 4.3 | 1 | 2 |
| 31 | Akin Gump | 1.6 | 1 | 0 | 31 | Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe | 4.3 | 3 | 1 |
| 32 | Bingham Mccutchen | 1.5 | 1 | 0 | 32 | Skadden, Arps | 4.3 | 11 | 10 |
| 33 | Simpson Thacher | 1.5 | 2 | 0 | 33 | Alston & Bird | 4.2 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | Cahill Gordon & Reindel | 1.5 | 1 | 0 | 34 | Winston & Strawn | 4.2 | 2 | 2 |
| 35 | Ropes & Gray | 1.5 | 1 | 0 | 35 | Ropes & Gray | 4.2 | 7 | 2 |
| 36 | Kirkland & Ellis | 1.5 | 2 | 0 | 36 | Wilmerhale | 4.0 | 2 | 2 |
| 37 | Proskauer Rose | 1.4 | 2 | 0 | 37 | Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft | 4.0 | 6 | 3 |
| 38 | Dla Piper Us | 1.2 | 1 | 0 | 38 | Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher | 4.0 | 5 | 2 |
| 39 | Wachtell, Lipton | 1.2 | 1 | 0 | 39 | O'Melveny & Myers | 3.7 | 2 | 2 |
| 40 | Stroock & Stroock & Lavan | 1.1 | 1 | 0 | D | 40 | Dechert | 3.6 | 1 | 2 | D |
| 41 | Shearman & Sterling | 1.1 | 1 | 0 | 41 | Kirkland & Ellis | 3.4 | 5 | 1 |
| 42 | Debevoise & Plimpton | 0.9 | 1 | 0 | 42 | Cravath, Swaine & Moore | 3.3 | 7 | 5 |
| 43 | Greenberg Traurig | 0.8 | 0 | 1 | 43 | Latham & Watkins | 3.3 | 1 | 6 |
| 44 | Baker & Mckenzie | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | F | 44 | Hughes Hubbard & Reed | 3.0 | 3 | 1 |
| 45 | Carter Ledyard & Milburn | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 45 | Dla Piper Us | 2.9 | 2 | 1 |
| 46 | Moses & Singer | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 46 | Schulte Roth & Zabel | 2.8 | 3 | 5 |
| 47 | Fulbright & Jaworski | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 47 | Fried, Frank | 2.8 | 2 | 5 |
| 48 | Mcdermott Will & Emery | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 48 | Bingham Mccutchen | 2.8 | 0 | 3 |
| 49 | Pillsbury Winthrop | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 49 | Jones Day | 2.7 | 2 | 4 |
| 50 | Blank Rome | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | Fulbright & Jaworski | 2.6 | 0 | 1 |
| 51 | Pryor Cashman | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 51 | Carter Ledyard & Milburn | 2.5 | 0 | 1 |
| 52 | Loeb & Loeb | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 52 | Pryor Cashman | 2.5 | 0 | 1 |
| 53 | Fitzpatrick, Cella | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 53 | Linklaters | 2.4 | 2 | 2 | F |
| 54 | Bryan Cave | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 54 | Willkie Farr & Gallagher | 2.4 | 3 | 4 |
| 55 | Goodwin Procter | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | Cahill Gordon & Reindel | 2.3 | 2 | 3 |
| 56 | Seward & Kissel | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 56 | Proskauer Rose | 2.3 | 3 | 2 |
| 57 | Herrick, Feinstein | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 57 | Mcdermott Will & Emery | 2.2 | 0 | 1 |
| 58 | Wilmerhale | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 58 | Paul, Weiss | 2.0 | 4 | 4 |
| 59 | Morgan, Lewis & Bockius | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 59 | Loeb & Loeb | 1.9 | 0 | 1 |
| 60 | Winston & Strawn | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | Seward & Kissel | 1.8 | 1 | 1 |
| 61 | Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 61 | Akin Gump | 1.3 | 0 | 1 |
| 62 | Paul, Hastings | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 62 | Kramer Levin | 1.0 | 2 | 0 |
| 63 | Kramer Levin | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 63 | Fitzpatrick, Cella | 1.0 | 0 | 1 |
| 64 | Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 64 | Wachtell, Lipton | 0.7 | 1 | 0 |
| 65 | Fried, Frank | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 65 | Epstein Becker & Green | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 66 | White & Case | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 66 | Bryan Cave | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 67 | Cravath, Swaine & Moore | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 67 | Patterson | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
This chart ranks the percentage of hispanic partners and associates at Manhattan law offices.
An asterisk indicates that the firm did not provide this information. We treated missing data as if it were zero.
The chart includes all firms with 100 attorneys in their Manhattan office. See
How We Did This for more on our ranking process.
Firms are graded on a curve. We divide the firms into quintiles, and then assign letter grades based on
this division. We combined the grades with those from other diversity rankings to create a
diversity report card of firms' overall minority employment rates. Note that firms with zero representation in any demographic category receive an "F"
regardless of quintile.
Bold denotes the top 20 most prestigious law firms in Manhattan, according to vault's 2009 regional rankings