diversity rankings::Manhattan::hispanic (from betterlegalprofession.org)
| partners |
|
associates |
|
| rank |
firm |
percent |
M |
F |
|
rank |
firm |
percent |
M |
F |
|
| 1 | Curtis, Mallet-prevost | 13.3 | 6 | 0 | A | 1 | Curtis, Mallet-prevost | 14.7 | 7 | 4 | A |
| 2 | Fragomen, Del Rey | 8.5 | 1 | 3 | 2 | Fragomen, Del Rey | 10.9 | 5 | 9 |
| 3 | Hughes Hubbard & Reed | 6.2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | Chadbourne & Parke | 9.0 | 4 | 6 |
| 4 | Cleary Gottlieb | 5.6 | 4 | 1 | 4 | Cleary Gottlieb | 7.7 | 13 | 13 |
| 5 | Milbank, Tweed | 4.6 | 2 | 2 | 5 | Simpson Thacher | 7.5 | 25 | 13 |
| 6 | Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher | 4.4 | 2 | 1 | 6 | Katten Muchin Rosenman | 7.2 | 3 | 3 |
| 7 | Dewey & Leboeuf | 4.3 | 4 | 3 | 7 | Sidley Austin | 7.1 | 11 | 7 |
| 8 | Chadbourne & Parke | 4.1 | 3 | 0 | 8 | Morrison & Foerster | 6.8 | 2 | 5 |
| 9 | Kelley Drye & Warren | 3.9 | 2 | 1 | 9 | Hogan & Hartson | 6.8 | 1 | 4 |
| 10 | Katten Muchin Rosenman | 3.7 | 3 | 0 | 10 | Nixon Peabody | 6.7 | 3 | 0 |
| 11 | Skadden, Arps | 3.7 | 4 | 4 | 11 | Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher | 6.1 | 7 | 2 |
| 12 | Latham & Watkins | 3.6 | 3 | 0 | 12 | Kaye Scholer | 6.0 | 6 | 5 |
| 13 | Davis Polk & Wardwell | 3.1 | 4 | 0 | 13 | Hughes Hubbard & Reed | 6.0 | 5 | 3 |
| 14 | Epstein Becker & Green | 3.0 | 1 | 1 | 14 | Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe | 5.9 | 5 | 2 |
| 15 | Willkie Farr & Gallagher | 2.9 | 2 | 1 | 15 | Covington & Burling | 5.9 | 2 | 2 |
| 16 | Alston & Bird | 2.6 | 1 | 0 | B | 16 | Sonnenschein Nath | 5.9 | 3 | 2 |
| 17 | Covington & Burling | 2.6 | 1 | 0 | 17 | Davis Polk & Wardwell | 5.9 | 10 | 16 |
| 18 | Weil, Gotshal & Manges | 2.5 | 4 | 0 | 18 | Morgan, Lewis & Bockius | 5.8 | 2 | 7 | B |
| 19 | Schulte Roth & Zabel | 2.3 | 2 | 0 | 19 | Winston & Strawn | 5.8 | 3 | 4 |
| 20 | Nixon Peabody | 2.2 | 1 | 0 | 20 | Paul, Hastings | 5.8 | 3 | 6 |
| 21 | O'Melveny & Myers | 2.2 | 0 | 1 | 21 | Weil, Gotshal & Manges | 5.8 | 13 | 16 |
| 22 | Clifford Chance Us | 2.2 | 2 | 0 | 22 | Milbank, Tweed | 5.7 | 9 | 8 |
| 23 | Sidley Austin | 2.1 | 2 | 1 | 23 | White & Case | 5.7 | 10 | 8 |
| 24 | Stroock & Stroock & Lavan | 2.1 | 2 | 0 | 24 | Herrick, Feinstein | 5.6 | 1 | 3 |
| 25 | Proskauer Rose | 2.1 | 3 | 0 | 25 | Moses & Singer | 5.1 | 2 | 0 |
| 26 | Bingham Mccutchen | 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 26 | Latham & Watkins | 5.0 | 5 | 11 |
| 27 | Jones Day | 2.0 | 2 | 0 | 27 | Shearman & Sterling | 5.0 | 8 | 10 |
| 28 | Linklaters | 1.9 | 1 | 0 | 28 | Debevoise & Plimpton | 5.0 | 7 | 12 |
| 29 | Kaye Scholer | 1.9 | 1 | 1 | 29 | Holland & Knight | 5.0 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | Paul, Weiss | 1.9 | 2 | 0 | 30 | Wilmerhale | 4.8 | 2 | 3 |
| 31 | Patterson | 1.8 | 0 | 1 | C | 31 | Mayer Brown | 4.8 | 4 | 3 | C |
| 32 | Mayer Brown | 1.8 | 1 | 0 | 32 | Dewey & Leboeuf | 4.8 | 9 | 10 |
| 33 | Holland & Knight | 1.7 | 1 | 0 | 33 | Baker & Mckenzie | 4.7 | 2 | 1 |
| 34 | Akin Gump | 1.6 | 1 | 0 | 34 | Stroock & Stroock & Lavan | 4.6 | 2 | 5 |
| 35 | Reed Smith | 1.6 | 1 | 0 | 35 | Skadden, Arps | 4.5 | 13 | 16 |
| 36 | Morrison & Foerster | 1.6 | 0 | 1 | 36 | Cravath, Swaine & Moore | 4.5 | 11 | 5 |
| 37 | Dechert | 1.4 | 1 | 0 | 37 | O'Melveny & Myers | 4.3 | 1 | 5 |
| 38 | Paul, Hastings | 1.4 | 1 | 0 | 38 | Ropes & Gray | 4.2 | 6 | 3 |
| 39 | Cahill Gordon & Reindel | 1.4 | 1 | 0 | 39 | Clifford Chance Us | 4.2 | 3 | 5 |
| 40 | Ropes & Gray | 1.4 | 1 | 0 | 40 | Pillsbury Winthrop | 4.1 | 1 | 2 |
| 41 | Hogan & Hartson | 1.4 | 0 | 1 | 41 | Goodwin Procter | 4.0 | 0 | 4 |
| 42 | Winston & Strawn | 1.3 | 1 | 0 | 42 | Troutman Sanders | 4.0 | 2 | 0 |
| 43 | Wachtell, Lipton | 1.2 | 1 | 0 | 43 | Kelley Drye & Warren | 4.0 | 1 | 3 |
| 44 | Dla Piper Us | 1.1 | 1 | 0 | 44 | Fulbright & Jaworski | 3.9 | 0 | 2 |
| 45 | Fried, Frank | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 45 | Greenberg Traurig | 3.8 | 1 | 3 |
| 46 | Sonnenschein Nath | 1.0 | 0 | 1 | D | 46 | Cahill Gordon & Reindel | 3.8 | 3 | 5 | D |
| 47 | Debevoise & Plimpton | 0.9 | 1 | 0 | 47 | Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft | 3.8 | 6 | 3 |
| 48 | Kirkland & Ellis | 0.8 | 1 | 0 | 48 | Kirkland & Ellis | 3.7 | 7 | 1 |
| 49 | Simpson Thacher | 0.8 | 1 | 0 | 49 | Schulte Roth & Zabel | 3.6 | 7 | 6 |
| 50 | Greenberg Traurig | 0.7 | 0 | 1 | 50 | Loeb & Loeb | 3.5 | 1 | 1 |
| 51 | White & Case | 0.7 | 1 | 0 | 51 | Dla Piper Us | 3.1 | 2 | 2 |
| 52 | Moses & Singer | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | F | 52 | Bingham Mccutchen | 3.1 | 0 | 2 |
| 53 | King & Spalding | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 53 | Mcdermott Will & Emery | 2.7 | 0 | 2 |
| 54 | Carter Ledyard & Milburn | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 54 | Fried, Frank | 2.6 | 4 | 4 |
| 55 | Troutman Sanders | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 55 | Willkie Farr & Gallagher | 2.6 | 2 | 6 |
| 56 | Blank Rome | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 56 | Fitzpatrick, Cella | 2.4 | 1 | 1 |
| 57 | Baker & Mckenzie | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 57 | Dechert | 2.3 | 1 | 2 |
| 58 | Pryor Cashman | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 58 | Pryor Cashman | 2.2 | 0 | 1 |
| 59 | Fitzpatrick, Cella | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 59 | Proskauer Rose | 2.1 | 3 | 2 |
| 60 | Fulbright & Jaworski | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | Carter Ledyard & Milburn | 2.1 | 0 | 1 |
| 61 | Loeb & Loeb | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 61 | Alston & Bird | 1.9 | 0 | 1 | F |
| 62 | Pillsbury Winthrop | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 62 | Paul, Weiss | 1.9 | 4 | 3 |
| 63 | Mcdermott Will & Emery | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 63 | Akin Gump | 1.7 | 0 | 2 |
| 64 | Goodwin Procter | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 64 | Reed Smith | 1.4 | 0 | 1 |
| 65 | Wilmerhale | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 65 | Bryan Cave | 1.3 | 1 | 0 |
| 66 | Bryan Cave | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 66 | Jones Day | 1.0 | 1 | 1 |
| 67 | Seward & Kissel | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 67 | Kramer Levin | 0.9 | 2 | 0 |
| 68 | Herrick, Feinstein | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 68 | Seward & Kissel | 0.8 | 1 | 0 |
| 69 | Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 69 | Linklaters | 0.7 | 1 | 0 |
| 70 | Morgan, Lewis & Bockius | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 70 | King & Spalding | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 71 | Kramer Levin | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 71 | Blank Rome | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 72 | Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 72 | Epstein Becker & Green | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 73 | Shearman & Sterling | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 73 | Patterson | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 74 | Cravath, Swaine & Moore | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 74 | Wachtell, Lipton | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
This chart ranks the percentage of hispanic partners and associates at Manhattan law offices.
An asterisk indicates that the firm did not provide this information. We treated missing data as if it were zero.
The chart includes all firms with 100 attorneys in their Manhattan office. See
How We Did This for more on our ranking process.
Firms are graded on a curve. We divide the firms into quintiles, and then assign letter grades based on
this division. We combined the grades with those from other diversity rankings to create a
diversity report card of firms' overall minority employment rates. Note that firms with zero representation in any demographic category receive an "F"
regardless of quintile.
Bold denotes the top 20 most prestigious law firms in Manhattan, according to vault's 2009 regional rankings
Firms highlighted in pink laid off a number of attorneys equivalent to 15% or more of their U.S. non-partner lawyers after February 1, 2009.