diversity rankings::Manhattan::out lgbt (from betterlegalprofession.org)
| partners |
|
associates |
|
| rank |
firm |
percent |
M |
F |
|
rank |
firm |
percent |
M |
F |
|
| 1 | Quinn Emanuel | 11.9 | 2 | 3 | A | 1 | Cleary Gottlieb | 8.4 | 23 | 9 | A |
| 2 | Mcdermott Will & Emery | 6.3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | Alston & Bird | 8.3 | 3 | 1 |
| 3 | Linklaters | 6.3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | Linklaters | 8.0 | 12 | 2 |
| 4 | Kirkland & Ellis | 5.8 | 5 | 3 | 4 | Patterson | 7.1 | 7 | 2 |
| 5 | Patterson | 5.5 | 3 | 0 | 5 | Kirkland & Ellis | 6.5 | 8 | 3 |
| 6 | Wilmerhale | 5.0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | Quinn Emanuel | 6.3 | 6 | 1 |
| 7 | Morrison & Foerster | 4.9 | 2 | 1 | 7 | Bingham Mccutchen | 6.1 | 3 | 3 |
| 8 | Cravath, Swaine & Moore | 4.9 | 4 | 0 | 8 | O'Melveny & Myers | 5.6 | 4 | 1 |
| 9 | Alston & Bird | 4.8 | 2 | 0 | 9 | Latham & Watkins | 5.6 | 11 | 2 |
| 10 | Debevoise & Plimpton | 4.6 | 5 | 0 | 10 | Akin Gump | 5.4 | 6 | 0 |
| 11 | Cahill Gordon & Reindel | 4.4 | 3 | 0 | 11 | Paul, Weiss | 5.4 | 12 | 9 |
| 12 | Cleary Gottlieb | 4.3 | 3 | 1 | 12 | Arnold & Porter LLP | 5.4 | 1 | 2 |
| 13 | Goodwin Procter | 4.1 | 2 | 0 | 13 | Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe | 5.2 | 4 | 1 |
| 14 | Fulbright & Jaworski | 4.0 | 2 | 0 | 14 | Wilmerhale | 5.1 | 2 | 3 |
| 15 | Willkie Farr & Gallagher | 3.9 | 2 | 2 | B | 15 | Morrison & Foerster | 5.0 | 3 | 2 | B |
| 16 | Wachtell, Lipton | 3.8 | 3 | 0 | 16 | Baker & Hostetler | 4.9 | 3 | * |
| 17 | Paul, Weiss | 3.7 | 2 | 2 | 17 | Weil, Gotshal & Manges | 4.8 | 19 | 2 |
| 18 | Dewey & Leboeuf | 3.5 | 5 | 0 | 18 | Davis Polk & Wardwell | 4.8 | 19 | 2 |
| 19 | Skadden, Arps | 3.4 | 5 | 1 | 19 | Covington & Burling | 4.8 | 1 | 2 |
| 20 | Latham & Watkins | 3.3 | 3 | 0 | 20 | Cravath, Swaine & Moore | 4.8 | 16 | 1 |
| 21 | Herrick, Feinstein | 3.0 | 2 | 0 | 21 | Debevoise & Plimpton | 4.7 | 15 | 2 |
| 22 | Bryan Cave | 2.9 | 1 | 1 | 22 | Dla Piper Us | 4.5 | 5 | 0 |
| 23 | Proskauer Rose | 2.9 | 3 | 1 | 23 | Kelley Drye & Warren | 4.5 | 3 | 1 |
| 24 | Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe | 2.9 | 2 | 0 | 24 | Fried, Frank | 4.3 | 9 | 2 |
| 25 | Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher | 2.9 | 2 | 0 | 25 | Dechert | 4.1 | 3 | 1 |
| 26 | Bingham Mccutchen | 2.8 | 2 | 0 | 26 | Shearman & Sterling | 4.1 | 11 | 0 |
| 27 | Ropes & Gray | 2.8 | 1 | 1 | 27 | Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft | 3.8 | 6 | 2 |
| 28 | Reed Smith | 2.7 | 2 | 0 | 28 | Loeb & Loeb | 3.6 | 1 | 1 |
| 29 | Akin Gump | 2.7 | 2 | 0 | 29 | Skadden, Arps | 3.6 | 16 | 3 | C |
| 30 | O'Melveny & Myers | 2.5 | 1 | 0 | C | 30 | Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher | 3.6 | 7 | 0 |
| 31 | Chadbourne & Parke | 2.5 | 1 | 1 | 31 | Pillsbury Winthrop | 3.5 | 1 | 1 |
| 32 | Covington & Burling | 2.4 | 1 | 0 | 32 | Dewey & Leboeuf | 3.4 | 6 | 5 |
| 33 | Sidley Austin | 2.4 | 3 | 0 | 33 | Sidley Austin | 3.3 | 4 | 2 |
| 34 | Baker & Hostetler | 2.4 | * | 1 | 34 | Herrick, Feinstein | 3.2 | 1 | 1 |
| 35 | Arnold & Porter LLP | 2.3 | 1 | 0 | 35 | Fitzpatrick, Cella | 3.0 | 3 | 0 |
| 36 | Simpson Thacher | 2.3 | 2 | 1 | 36 | Wachtell, Lipton | 3.0 | 4 | 0 |
| 37 | Schulte Roth & Zabel | 2.2 | 2 | 0 | 37 | Goodwin Procter | 2.9 | 2 | 1 |
| 38 | Shearman & Sterling | 2.1 | 2 | 0 | 38 | Kramer Levin | 2.6 | 5 | 0 |
| 39 | Kramer Levin | 2.0 | 2 | 0 | 39 | Simpson Thacher | 2.6 | 9 | 2 |
| 40 | Clifford Chance Us | 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 40 | Ropes & Gray | 2.5 | 3 | 2 |
| 41 | Pillsbury Winthrop | 1.7 | 1 | 0 | 41 | Hughes Hubbard & Reed | 2.3 | 3 | 0 |
| 42 | Paul, Hastings | 1.6 | 0 | 1 | 42 | Hogan & Hartson | 2.3 | 1 | 1 |
| 43 | Hughes Hubbard & Reed | 1.6 | 1 | 0 | D | 43 | Willkie Farr & Gallagher | 2.3 | 4 | 2 | D |
| 44 | Morgan, Lewis & Bockius | 1.6 | 0 | 1 | 44 | Bryan Cave | 2.2 | 0 | 1 |
| 45 | Dechert | 1.5 | 1 | 0 | 45 | Kaye Scholer | 2.1 | 2 | 1 |
| 46 | Mayer Brown | 1.5 | 1 | 0 | 46 | Chadbourne & Parke | 2.0 | 1 | 1 |
| 47 | Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft | 1.5 | 0 | 1 | 47 | Cahill Gordon & Reindel | 2.0 | 4 | 0 |
| 48 | Loeb & Loeb | 1.4 | 1 | 0 | 48 | Seward & Kissel | 1.9 | 1 | 1 |
| 49 | Weil, Gotshal & Manges | 1.3 | 1 | 1 | 49 | Mcdermott Will & Emery | 1.9 | 0 | 1 |
| 50 | Dla Piper Us | 1.2 | 1 | 0 | 50 | Mayer Brown | 1.8 | 2 | 0 |
| 51 | Fried, Frank | 1.1 | 1 | 0 | 51 | White & Case | 1.8 | 3 | 2 |
| 52 | White & Case | 0.9 | 1 | 0 | 52 | Clifford Chance Us | 1.6 | 1 | 1 |
| 53 | Greenberg Traurig | 0.9 | 1 | 0 | 53 | Paul, Hastings | 1.6 | 2 | 0 |
| 54 | Davis Polk & Wardwell | 0.8 | 1 | 0 | 54 | Proskauer Rose | 1.4 | 1 | 2 |
| 55 | SEYFARTH SHAW | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | F | 55 | Greenberg Traurig | 1.2 | 1 | 0 |
| 56 | King & Spalding | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 56 | Schulte Roth & Zabel | 1.1 | 3 | 0 |
| 57 | Epstein Becker & Green | 0.0 | * | * | 57 | Winston & Strawn | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | F |
| 58 | Blank Rome | 0.0 | * | * | 58 | Stroock & Stroock & Lavan | 0.8 | 1 | 0 |
| 59 | Pryor Cashman | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 59 | SEYFARTH SHAW | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 60 | Curtis, Mallet-prevost | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | King & Spalding | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 61 | Fitzpatrick, Cella | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 61 | Epstein Becker & Green | 0.0 | * | * |
| 62 | Kelley Drye & Warren | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 62 | Fulbright & Jaworski | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 63 | Seward & Kissel | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 63 | Blank Rome | 0.0 | * | * |
| 64 | Katten Muchin Rosenman | 0.0 | * | * | 64 | Pryor Cashman | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 65 | Hogan & Hartson | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 65 | Curtis, Mallet-prevost | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 66 | Winston & Strawn | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 66 | Reed Smith | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 67 | Stroock & Stroock & Lavan | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 67 | Morgan, Lewis & Bockius | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 68 | Kaye Scholer | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 68 | Katten Muchin Rosenman | 0.0 | * | * |
| 69 | Jones Day | 0.0 | * | * | 69 | Jones Day | 0.0 | * | * |
The chart includes all firms with 100 attorneys in their Manhattan office.
An asterisk indicates that the firm did not provide this information. We treated missing data as if it were zero.
See How We Did This for more information on our methodology.
Bold denotes the most prestigious law firms in Manhattan, according to vault's 2011 regional rankings